Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Grand Theft Auto 5

Lindsay Lohan’s Four-Year Lawsuit Against Take-Two Ends in Unanimous Rejection

This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

I will be the first to admit I had completely forgotten Lindsay Lohan tried to sue Take-Two Interactive. But, four years after the lawsuit was instituted, it’s finally been resolved, and, surprise surprise, it did not turn out in her favor. Again.

Recommended Videos

Before we delve into the completely expected results of the lawsuit, let’s jump back to 2014 to give everyone a refresher course. Lohan tried to sue Take-Two Interactive because she felt the minor character Lacey Jones looked like her, sounded like her, and dressed like her, and this somehow invaded her privacy. The sticking point of Lohan’s lawsuit was that Grand Theft Auto 5’s promotional material utilized pictures of Jones, one of which depicted her taking a selfie while wearing a red bikini and throwing the peace sign, not unlike a real picture of Lohan wearing a red bikini and throwing the peace sign. Calling the lawsuit spurious would be a disservice, as it was initially thrown out in 2014. What concluded yesterday was an appeal to New York State’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, which didn’t fare any better.

According to Reuters, the court unanimously rejected the case. According to Judge Eugene Fahey, Jones is “nothing more than cultural comment” and a depiction of a generic “twenty something.” Judge Fahey went more into detail:

The amended complaint was properly dismissed because the artistic renderings are indistinct, satirical representations of the style, look, and persona of a modern, beach-going young woman that are not reasonably identifiable as plaintiff.

Fahey also went on record that a computer image could be considered a “portrait,” which could be used in invasion of privacy claims. However, since he already stated Jones is a satirical jab at a particular demographic and not Lohan herself, the character doesn’t constitute any attack or invasion of privacy aimed at Lohan.

Neither Lohan’s spokesman, her lawyer, nor Take-Two commented on the decision. With any luck, this will be the last we hear of the lawsuit.


Twinfinite is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Aaron Greenbaum
Aaron Greenbaum
Aaron was a freelance writer between June 2018 and October 2022. All you have to do to get his attention is talk about video games, anime, and/or Dungeons & Dragons - also people in spandex fighting rubber suited monsters. Aaron largely specialized in writing news for Twinfinite during his four years at the site.
facebook