Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Michael Pachter

Activision Acquiring King Was a Brilliant Move, According to Pachter

Pachter tackles the 5.9 billion dollar topic.
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information

On episode six of Pachter Factor, a SIFTD.net user asked industry analyst, Michael Pachter, a question about the acquisition of mobile game company and creators of Candy Crush, King Digital Entertainment, by Destiny and Call of Duty publisher Activision.

Recommended Videos

Zetsabre of SIFTD asked:
“How can Activision justify spending $5.9 billion to acquire King and not use that money towards development of new IP?”

First off, Pachter doesn’t understand why gamers are assuming Activision had the choice of either acquiring King or developing a new IP. Activision, one of the biggest money-makers in the gaming industry thanks to their huge franchises, does not have a finite amount of capital to spend. “Activision will spend whatever it chooses to on development of new IP. So, buying King didn’t suddenly drain Activision’s bank account to the point where it can no longer afford to do anything.”

He continues, talking about how Activision will end up getting their money back in the future by stating, “King generates about 800 million a year in what we call in the finance world ‘free cash flow.’ So, by spending 5 billion dollars, Activision is getting 800 million a year in free cash flow.”

As for what Activision is going to do with King, which hasn’t been specified as of yet, Pachter has a guess: Creating rip-offs. If players are big enough fans of recognizable franchises, they’ll prove it by paying for the mobile versions of the game as well. “I think it’s highly likely King is going to make a Clash of Clans rip-off. They’re going to copy the model. Clash of Clans essentially is a tower defense game; you defend your castle. Imagine if they make that Clash of Clans rip-off game, and they re-skin it, and they call it World of Warcraft: Dungeon Defender?”

Pachter gives praise to Bobby Kotick, CEO & president of Activision Blizzard, on the smart acquisition. “I think that if you start making games based on recognizable Blizzard IP, you actually have something in that mobile world.” He ends the discussion by going back to the original question, “How could THEY NOT justify spending $5.9 billion?”

Let us know if your thoughts have changed about the acquisition after reading Pachter’s thoughts in the comments section below!

MORE NEWS

This post was originally written by Danny Endurance.


Twinfinite is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Chris Jecks
Chris Jecks
Chris Jecks has been covering the games industry for over eight years. He typically covers new releases, FIFA, Fortnite, any good shooters, and loves nothing more than a good Pro Clubs session with the lads. Chris has a History degree from the University of Central Lancashire. He spends his days eagerly awaiting the release of BioShock 4.
twitter