Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Alfonso Ribeiro

Registration of Alfonso Ribeiro’s “Carlton Dance” Refused by U.S. Copyright Office

This article is over 5 years old and may contain outdated information

Alfonso Ribeiro has been denied in his efforts to copyright his signature “Carlton Dance”, made popular by The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air and used in several of today’s video games.

Recommended Videos

In December of last year, Ribeiro became the second of many popular figures to file a lawsuit against Epic Games for their use of his dance in a Fortnite emote. The lawsuit also included Take-Two Interactive, publisher of the NBA 2K series.

In a letter obtained by The Holywood Reporter, the U.S. Copyright Office addresses Ribeiro’s lawyer, David Hecht, stating the following:

“Upon review of the material deposited for registration, we must refuse registration for The Dance by Alfonso Ribeiro – Variation B because the work submitted for registration is a simple dance routine. As such, it is not registrable as a choreographic work. The Office defines choreography as the composition and arrangement of a related series of dance movements and patterns organized into an integrated, coherent, and expressive whole. By definition, choreography is a subset of dance, and the U.S. Copyright Office may only register a choreographic work if it contains a sufficient amount of choreographic authorship.”

This comes following a dismissal brief filed last year by Dale Cendali of Kirkland & Ellis, an attorney working for Take-Two, where she states this:

“This lawsuit suffers from a host of issues ranging from a lack of plausible ownership, to a lack of substantial similarity, to preemption by the Copyright Act. Fundamentally, it conflicts with the First Amendment as it attempts to impose liability, and thereby chill creative expression, by claiming rights that Plaintiff does not hold. It should be dismissed.”

While this doesn’t spell the end for Ribeiro’s litigation against Epic Games and Take-Two Interactive, it could lead to complications. We’ll keep you updated on the legal process as it moves forward.

Featured image credit: Fandom


Twinfinite is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Craig Snyder
Craig Snyder
Craig is a long-time web developer and internet marketer who found his true passion in writing—specifically about games. After being spoiled with every NES game he could ever want as a kid, he's continued playing on console and PC for over 25 years. You won't find someone more nostalgic over Final Fantasy VII and River City Ransom.