Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
fire emblem: three houses

Your Second Playthrough of Fire Emblem: Three Houses Might Be Way More Depressing Than Your First

This article is over 5 years old and may contain outdated information

Fire Emblem: Three Houses serves as a fantastic, one-shot, standalone experience. But did you know that, under the right circumstances, playing through the game a second time can lead to some sad times?

Recommended Videos

Spoiler warning: This article contains spoilers for the entire first act of Fire Emblem: Three Houses.

My first run with the game saw me aligning with Edelgard and the Black Eagles. Somewhat interestingly, this route presented some pretty major decisions you had to make very early on in the game, which involved Byleth taking a more active role in the rise of the Adrestian Empire and helping Edelgard become the new emperor.

As you approach the end of the first act, you learn more about Edelgard’s own motivations and her disdain for the Crests. She wants to tear down Fodlan and rebuild it from the ground up. She wants to create a meritocratic society in place of the idle church worship that exists now.

By the end of that chapter, you realize that it’s Edelgard versus the world, as the Kingdom of Faerghus allies with the Church of Seiros to take her down.

While Claude and the Leicester Alliance are… off somewhere, doing who knows what.

Anyway, Edelgard’s ambitions are admirable. She believes in equality, and is willing to do whatever it takes to make that new dream a reality. Her methods are callous, but I found myself drawn in by her single-mindedness and determination to build a better Fodlan.

And, y’know, it’s way easier to side with her and see the Church of Seiros as the bad guys when you’ve got a shady as hell Archbishop like Lady Rhea.

This woman is so obviously shady it hurts.

At the end of my first playthrough, I was completely satisfied with the conclusion I had come to, but of course, I had to see the other side of the story as well. So I jumped straight into a second playthrough, and this time, I sided with the Church.

Right off the bat, the tone of the story in Fire Emblem: Three Houses feels completely different than if you had sided with the Black Eagles. As I mentioned in my review, there are so many little hints and details that subtly point towards Edelgard’s secret identity as the Flame Emperor, and you start to pay more attention to her words and actions.

Edelgard quietly nudges Byleth to her side by slowly bringing up her own ideals and ambitions for a Crest-less world, she talks about having to make hard decisions. And all the while, as you’re aligned with the Church, you’ve got Rhea at your side telling you that you’re doing right by the Goddess, and that she’ll rip the hearts out of anyone who dare opposes Seiros.

All with that light smile on her face.

Siding with the Church in Fire Emblem: Three Houses feels incredibly unsettling, which is weird, because you are supposedly on the path of righteousness, compared to Edelgard’s nihilistic tendencies.

It’s got everything to do with the fact that you know Edelgard’s vision for Fodlan is likely the best long-term outcome, but the Church lures you over to its side with the argument that Edelgard is starting a large scale war that will result in the deaths of countless innocents.

There’s also the uncomfortable fact that you’ll never quite know the full truth of Byleth’s past without staying with the Church and Rhea, especially once Sothis’ identity as the Goddess is revealed.

On paper, the Church route in Fire Emblem: Three Houses should be seen as the canon story route to take: it’ll likely answer most of your story questions about Byleth (questions that Edelgard, or any of the other House leaders for that matter, would never be able to answer).

Plus, you’ll be keeping peace in the world by killing the mad emperor who’s trying to reshape the world to fit her own ideals.

When you just wanna say ‘yes’ to Edelgard, but the game won’t let you because you already made your choice, you heathen.

And yet, the writing in this game is so well-done that you can’t help but get that sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach when it finally comes time to sever ties with the Adrestian Empire and oppose Edelgard.

The game makes sure to hammer home the element of tragedy that underscores the Empire and Church’s irreconcilable differences such that even when you’re in the supposed role of the “good guy,” you never stop questioning your actions and wondering if you’re actually on the ‘right’ path.

Fire Emblem: Three Houses is a really tightly written game with believable characters that have complex motivations. Regardless of which path you choose, people are gonna get hurt, and there’s no clean way to wrap everything up.

Like all three House leaders, the best you can do is make peace with the choices you’ve made, and hope that your determination for your vision wins out over the rest.


Twinfinite is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Zhiqing Wan
Zhiqing Wan
Zhiqing is the Reviews Editor for Twinfinite, and a History graduate from Singapore. She's been in the games media industry for nine years, trawling through showfloors, conferences, and spending a ridiculous amount of time making in-depth spreadsheets for min-max-y RPGs. When she's not singing the praises of Amazon's Kindle as the greatest technological invention of the past two decades, you can probably find her in a FromSoft rabbit hole.